Bigamy does not undermine the institution of marriage 2
6th Aug 2009
Hello lovely people
For some religions marriage no longer provides the opportunity to manipulate people who choose to have a strong love relationship without the massive expense that a wedding ceremony requires. One religious group recently attempted to get some of the control back by offering a bargain combination of marriage for parents and baptism for their children at a discount. If those people wanted to succumb to the pressure of the church to control their lives, surely they would have done so before they had children?
All of the above actions undermine the institution of marriage, which should be a union of love (with witnesses and paperwork that confirms love rather than a legal cover-your-backside for future actions).
This bigamous woman probably has serious relationship issues that she brought with her from one or more previous lives as part of the blueprint for her life. Her sacral chakra may be completely out of balance, which means she will keep searching for a secure relationship but not understand what she wants or why she is never satisfied with a partner. She may have serious relationship issues stemming from incidents in her childhood where she formed a perception which are still impacting on her decisions and actions. She may have brought unresolved memories from previous lives with her. The lithium that has been prescribed to her will not neutralise any of these issues.
Did she undermine the institution of marriage? Or did she get people to question their own beliefs and perceptions? Did she get spiritual support on resolving her relationship issues and growing towards wholeness? Or was she punished for not toeing the line or “playing the game”?
Nothing prevents her from having a string of relationships without getting married – she had boyfriends in between her fake marriages and was not punished by law for any of those. However, she chose to rock the boat by having sham marriages, and her environment responded by punishing her rather than questioning to what extent the marriage ceremony has been degraded to a means of manipulation rather than a union of love.
When you read the title of this article, did you react because you wanted to protect your union of love, or because you responded to fear of shaking up your own beliefs in case I have a point?
Please leave a comment if you feel inspired.
Love and Light
Elsabe
